IS THERE A EUROPEAN IDENTITY?
The Mies van der Rohe Foundation has asked this question to the architects
who have won its prize. These are some of the concepts that answer the
question:
Awareness with its contexts, great diversity in a small area, reflection of
our culture, tradition, history and continuity, overlap reality, local
condition, collage of identities, experimental, innovation… qualities or
sensibilities that point towards the future and we would like to live with.
Studio 5 is part of a series of specialisation in Architecture as
Comparative Studies. They are courses that are also based on ‘the trip’ as an
experience that consolidates the specialisation:
Architecture and Landscape:
Destination Iceland
Architecture and Gender:
Destination Istanbul
Architecture and Time:
Destination Naples
Architecture and Democracy:
Destination Athens
Architecture and Hybrid:
Destination Marseille
Architecture and Referent:
Destination Stockholm
This year we have a DOUBLE DESTINATION!
Architecture and Identity:
Destination Madrid + Istanbul
• CONTENT
“Urban commoning neither simply “happens” in urban space, nor does it
simply produces urban space as a commodity to be distributed. Urban commoning
treats and establishes urban space as a medium through which institutions of
commoning take shape”
Stavros Stavrides, On Urban Commoning
Look at/study the competition for London 2015 DESIGNING THE URBAN COMMONS:
http://designingtheurbancommons.org
It consisted of re-imagining spaces in London as places for collaboration,
sharing and collective ownership. A competition inspired by the rights to the
commons.
When Maria Langarita was interviewed by the Mies van der Rohe Foundation,
she listed Campo de Cebada in Madrid as an example of a European identity. We
value her remarks on the use of public space with the knowledge how to use it.
Campo de Cebada is an urban experiment to make it visible, a risky approach to architecture
with a formalisation that was not to be predictable by its authors or its
users.
First Zuloark, along Basurama, designed a very clear strategy that answers
the same questions made by DESIGNING THE URBAN COMMONS:
What is the role of design?
Who is it for?
To whom does it benefit?
What are the resources?
• AIMS
In Studio 5 we will work from the local culture, mapping existing values,
connecting actors, designing exchange services as well as shaping social
innovation labs in order to generate and identify new situations in the city.
We begin a journey into the following public aspects:
- To detect new social and organizational forms, from linking production to
consumption and to recognize how the different items are made, from its raw
material to the final product.
- To be aware towards sustainability: to develop territorial concepts
established by social and environmental qualities of consumption.
Instead of a rigid architecture, the course proposes a new architecture
from a research on designs based on social actions. Energy, cultural events and
civil participation will also be our building materials, shaping structures
that have to be able to be calculated and drawn with technical details.
Therefore the results will be a common investigation with other subjects of the
course (structures, building construction, theory and urban planning).
• METHOD
The approach to Reality will be through workshops where we will build with
new materials and structures, and with journeys that involve different phases.
First, you create the expectation, followed by the experience of the emotional
impact, to reach finally the project that is driven by the emotional memory.
Studio 5 starts with a workshop on Instant Architecture directed by
Santiago Pérez, building a pavilion scale 1/1 in our courtyard. Then we will
travel to Madrid, to Campo de Cebada, where we will learn the strategies
designed by the architects Zuloark and Basurama. In Madrid we will also
participate in the construction of La Escuela Crece (ESDM), by Cirugeda.
This trip will bring out a real need to learn from the local, its
technology and social culture. In so doing, it will help us to adopt the
relationship, Architecture and Identity, and understood it as future
possibilities.
The students will be organized in groups of 3, incorporating Erasmus
students from different countries in each of them. An exchange of information
is encouraged, establishing a basis for a stimulating architectural production.
The weblog of our class will collect all exercises, plus crossed comments made
by each student of the work of their peers.
Note: Teaching language is English.
PROPOSED GUESTS:
- Santiago Pérez, Assistant Professor of Architecture
(University of Arkansas)
- Santiago Cirugeda, Architect (Recetas Urbanas)
- Zuloark
- Basurama
- Jose Miguel de Prada Poole, Architect
• SCHEDULE
Studio 5 begins on the 29/01/16 and finishes on the 20/05/16.
01-05/02/16. Workshop ELASTIC BOUNDARIES, directed by Santiago
Pérez.
29/02/16+01/03/16. Madrid: CAMPO DE CEBADA + ESDM.
The student’s goal is to learn and find opportunities for the coursework.
Once we return to Alicante, the students will work with the travelling
results and details, reinventing the social structure defined by uses and
materials.
• EVALUATION
Evaluation is continuous, with a weekly assessment of the works by the
teacher and fellow students (80% of the final grade) and a final course portfolio
(20% of the grade).
• BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Mongrel Rapture: The Architecture of Ashton Raggatt
McDougall. ARM Architecture et al.
- Ezio Manzini (2015) Design, When Everybody Designs. An
Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
- zuloark.com/campodecebada
- recetasurbanas.net
- basurama.org/textos-archivo
- srplab.net
- London 2015 DESIGNING THE URBAN COMMONS:
http://designingtheurbancommons.org
- pradapoole.tumblr.com
jsm 3/1/16
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario