sábado, 9 de abril de 2016

Game - Model - Timetabel Group: Anna, Anni, Bianca

With our Game: Braintrain we wanted to find out which atmosphere is the best to work and to learn. We created different scenarios in which one person had to solve a mathematical problem. At the beginning we thought that the quiet scenario would be the best to solve the mathematical problem but we recognized that every individual person has their one needs

 carts from the game










After a evaluation of our game we decided that we wanted to create a single space which would be changeable due to the needs of the students. 

Our solution was a movable facade with which you can create your own space (if you need an table you can build one with the help of the facade) with an simple pull and push system.










Timetable:

Pleased with our model we want to contine working on this facade so we made a scedule for the last weeks of the semester





























miércoles, 6 de abril de 2016

First presentation of design,first and last game,proposal facade for new construction_Marta Mochniak,Ege Balcıl,David Martinez_

-PRESENTATION- 






          


            
-GAME-


-PROPOSAL FOR FACADE-





Marta Mochniak_design for #chicken or the egg

This are the next step in a project #chicken or the egg. After showing idea of connecting people through the architecture i proposed a kind of a bank on a public square which accidently made people to meet each other. The first drawing is showing a bank with a place for a cup which is not streight at the bottom so- when two strangers seat next to each other, they put cups in a boxes and because of the slope, when they want to take them out to drink they put in touch with the second person. The next draving shows the developement of the idea. When you meet this person you are stressed, you seat in a very formal position but with the time going by, you start to feel more relaxed so you seat in a different way- not formal, more relaxed. That is why the bank is step by step giving you opportunities of choosing the way of "sittnig"-developing relation.



viernes, 1 de abril de 2016

Paper models_ Mobile structures


Structure1: Tensile spiral
Paper arches holt by fixed supports on both ends to the platform and by the tensions of the ropes that connect them all and make the single elements work as a whole.

Project use:
Concept structure: build a whole by a single elements.
The library weight can produce the needed tension for the ropes or wires.







Structure 2: Diaphragm
Extensile structure where geometry allows movement. It needs a force to be moved.
The model changes in three directions entailing a height variation.

Changeable shapes.
Possible uses: ceiling facade modulation.










Structure 3: Spring into Action
Structure working under compression that allows controlled deformation under tensile forces.

Shape: Corridor formation but it is needed to enlarge the central hole in order to take profit of the inner space.
Concept: structure turns into a mechanism for library.









Structure 4: Ron Resch pattern
Extensible structure in one direction in the 2D plane, where geometry allows movements. It needs a force to be moved.



Changeable shapes. Facade modulation that allows voids creation depending on the needs of the users.


# Work and program

Our group started working looking for some references that could use us to understand Santiago's project. 

.




The next step was analyzing what the different students in the school need. There are four careers: graphic design, interior design, fashion design and product design. We made a game that helped us to understand how this students think and that could start generating interesting spaces.


After it we played the game and the different results produced this:
As Kevin won we started drawing the spaces:


 Ikbal drawing as a product designer.
Virginia's drawing as a graphic designer.
Kevin's drawing as a fashion designer.

Alberto's drawing as a interior designer.

After this results we began thinking in new spaces but this time making a model. 



The result was not the expected but we have not give up.

  

The next step was thinking about how to continue working and we make the progam.

And then we decide to work with a methodology that each one propose ideas and the others are capable of transform it. In that way we are going to arrive to a cooperative solution that has to be united with the different ideas.