Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Pascale Atsma. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Pascale Atsma. Mostrar todas las entradas
lunes, 14 de marzo de 2016
lunes, 22 de febrero de 2016
viernes, 19 de febrero de 2016
martes, 16 de febrero de 2016
Critical Comment on Street Jewellery #487 / Pascale Atsma
by NESS LAFOY, JOSH STEVENSON, WILL VERITY, PAULINE MARCOMBE
The project is
localized in an area of the Haringey neighborhood, an area that is basically
used to get from one point to another. The street has got a lot of traffic,
people only use them to pass without looking around even though there are
several shops. The streets seems quite sad, due to the traffic and the rush of
people running through it.
The authors speak
of creating small works of art, to call it in some way, objects or decorations
that make you look around, look up in order to escape the routine of running
through the streets which, in first site don’t contribute anything.
It is called Street jewellery, because it is exactly what it is about, decorate the
street. It seems a very interesting project also because it consists basically
on ephemeral architecture that can be touched, destroyed, stolen or modified.
The only intention is to bring beauty. Here I think it could go a little
further, rather than just objects to see you should be able to interact with
them, they can be used to start a conversation, whether to stop two minutes and
look around, perhaps as a shelter from the rain. I think we live in a society that
live to quick, our lifestyle is stressed and we do not appreciate where we live
or where we spent every day.
They also talk of
creating an online platform where people could propose small or big
interventions, involving the whole society with all the help and enthusiasm of
the people, not just those who see it from outside, or in my case, even another
country, but the people whom live there themselves.
As examples of other solutions:
Xintiandi
Installation. Unstudio


http://www.unstudio.com/projects/xintiandi-installation
Sehstation pavilion, Andy Brauneis, in colaboration with Nicolette Baumeister y Christian Schüller
The pavilion " sehstation " is the centerpiece of the advertising campaign " Sehen Lernen " (learning looking) aimed at promoting awareness of citizens on design and use of public spaces. So the pavilion is designed as an observatory of urban space that invites citizens to pause and observe with a critical eye , their daily environment.
The shape of the pavilion reproduces the " bellows " of the first cameras , so that visitors can climb inside the staggered pyramid , obtaining a higher point of view , sit and watch...
http://blog.bellostes.com/?p=2347
Sehstation pavilion, Andy Brauneis, in colaboration with Nicolette Baumeister y Christian Schüller
The pavilion " sehstation " is the centerpiece of the advertising campaign " Sehen Lernen " (learning looking) aimed at promoting awareness of citizens on design and use of public spaces. So the pavilion is designed as an observatory of urban space that invites citizens to pause and observe with a critical eye , their daily environment.
The shape of the pavilion reproduces the " bellows " of the first cameras , so that visitors can climb inside the staggered pyramid , obtaining a higher point of view , sit and watch...
http://blog.bellostes.com/?p=2347
lunes, 15 de febrero de 2016
Critical Comment about Holland Park Mews
The project is based on the gathering of
neighbors, in response to the problem of an increasingly antisocial and independent
society. I think it is a good basis but I didnt really understand why they have
chosen the area of Holland Park, apart from the charm of the houses, it is an
area of luxury and class. Perhaps for this reason this location is selected,
because the people living there might tend to work and come home to a private
sphere, lacking all interest in their neighbors.
As for the proposal of some mobile parks as they
call it, I think it could be improved a lot. I chose this project partly
because of how it's done, I think it is a project that can still work hard and
improve, like all. The concept itself of having a "private" but at
the time shared mobile park, seems a bit confusing. They speak about the concept
of something "mine" to something “ours”, but if the mobile is in
front of one house, the owners of it have to take care about it individually. This
idea could have been quite polished, which at first may seem logical and good,
but in my personal opinion, in reality I do not think it would work.
I am really interested in the mews houses, how
they work and how they are integrated with each other. It´s a pity that they
have not worked more with the houses themselves, but only relied on the street.
As examples of other solutions to the mobiles
I have found PARKMOBILES:
An other example is PARKCYCLE SWARM:

Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)